From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n25LTom8167813 for ; Thu, 5 Mar 2009 15:29:50 -0600 Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 16:29:20 -0500 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3 v2] xfs: include header files for prototypes Message-ID: <20090305212920.GA1883@infradead.org> References: <20090304183136.525.13769.stgit@f10box.hanneseder.net> <20090304183418.525.22262.stgit@f10box.hanneseder.net> <20090305133917.GC14854@lst.de> <20090305141912.22775.64010.stgit@f10box.hanneseder.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090305141912.22775.64010.stgit@f10box.hanneseder.net> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Hannes Eder Cc: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com, Christoph Hellwig , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 03:20:25PM +0100, Hannes Eder wrote: > I still treat this as a Acked-by: ... Ok? Should be a review, as far as you can review these sort of patches.. > hm. but that way it is still included before xfs_mount.h. Sure, but the point is entirely the comment which describes the block of includes below. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs