public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin Steigerwald <Martin@lichtvoll.de>
To: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: LWN article: 4K disk sectors
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 15:17:47 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200903121517.48426.Martin@lichtvoll.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200903121452.16419@zmi.at>

Am Donnerstag 12 März 2009 schrieb Michael Monnerie:
> On Donnerstag 12 März 2009 Eric Sandeen wrote:
> > Take a look at the mkfs.xfs man page:
> >
> >        -s sector_size
> >               This option specifies the fundamental  sector  size  of
> >               the filesystem.  The sector_size is specified either as
> >               a value in bytes with size=value or as a base two loga-
> >               rithm value with log=value.  The default sector_size is
> >               512 bytes. The minimum value for sector  size  is  512;
> >               the  maximum is 32768 (32 KiB). The sector_size must be
> >               a power of 2 size and cannot be made  larger  than  the
> >               filesystem block size.
>
> Ugh, I felt so good this morning, until you responded ... ;-)
>
> I thought that it's a limitation of the Linux kernel in more parts than
> just the filesystem (like block cache), that sector sizes must be 512B.
> If I had a 4K drive, would that be usable with XFS already?

I have an USB stick with 2KB hardware sector size. It worked nicely when 
using fdisk instead of cfdisk which only supports 512 byte sectors. Dunno 
remember exactly which filesystems I tried back then.

And first I wondered why it had a partition in the first quarter of it and 
then empty space. I thought it might have been a fake 1 GB stick, but 
still just deleted the partition and made it size the whole disk in 
cfdisk - well at least I thought I did. The Linux kernel complained about 
writing beyond end of device while mkfsing, I think it was an ext3.

-- 
Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de
GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA  B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  reply	other threads:[~2009-03-12 14:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-03-12 11:58 LWN article: 4K disk sectors Michael Monnerie
2009-03-12 13:10 ` Eric Sandeen
2009-03-12 13:52   ` Michael Monnerie
2009-03-12 14:17     ` Martin Steigerwald [this message]
2009-03-12 15:03       ` Eric Sandeen
2009-03-14 19:10         ` Martin Steigerwald
2009-03-12 14:23     ` Martin K. Petersen
2009-03-12 14:58     ` Eric Sandeen
2009-03-14 15:26 ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200903121517.48426.Martin@lichtvoll.de \
    --to=martin@lichtvoll.de \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox