From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n2GA27iV083231 for ; Mon, 16 Mar 2009 05:02:28 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 18B3419C544 for ; Mon, 16 Mar 2009 03:01:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [18.85.46.34]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id 9MxphkuGDuNq32lR for ; Mon, 16 Mar 2009 03:01:46 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 06:01:16 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] [XFS] introduce a AG inode tree walker Message-ID: <20090316100116.GA16218@infradead.org> References: <1237117603-26071-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <20090316075338.GA19858@infradead.org> <20090316094019.GD26138@disturbed> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090316094019.GD26138@disturbed> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig , xfs@oss.sgi.com On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 08:40:19PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > If you drop the last patch (the iterator patch) does it work > ok? No. With patches 1-5 applied we deadlock early on because pag_ici_lock never gets released in xfs_sync_inodes_ag for the normal non-error case. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs