From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n2GAot4K086044 for ; Mon, 16 Mar 2009 05:51:15 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 8CFCD1C460DD for ; Mon, 16 Mar 2009 03:50:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [18.85.46.34]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id rEH7L4zEE47yoMFr for ; Mon, 16 Mar 2009 03:50:34 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 06:50:34 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] [XFS] Validate log feature fields correctly Message-ID: <20090316105034.GA13508@infradead.org> References: <1237116342-25701-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <1237116342-25701-2-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <20090315151546.GB7145@infradead.org> <20090316104904.GK26138@disturbed> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090316104904.GK26138@disturbed> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig , xfs@oss.sgi.com On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 09:49:04PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > I just find large numbers easier to parse in hex, especially as > we are expecting power-of-2 type numbers to come out of this. > I'll change it.... True, the power of two would be an argument for hex. Feel free to keep it. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs