From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: "Nathaniel W. Turner" <nate@houseofnate.net>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs_repair: open filesystem device exclusively
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 17:23:32 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090316212332.GA8496@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49B491EA.4090003@houseofnate.net>
On Sun, Mar 08, 2009 at 11:50:02PM -0400, Nathaniel W. Turner wrote:
> (Error messages could probably be improved to be more user-friendly in
> this new failure case, and it probably wouldn't hurt to add a BLKROGET
> ioctl to check for read-only block devices with read-write permissions,
> but this does the job for me.)
>
> Signed-off-by: Nathaniel W. Turner <nate@houseofnate.net>
> ---
> repair/init.c | 2 ++
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/repair/init.c b/repair/init.c
> index 8e508c4..7e5052c 100644
> --- a/repair/init.c
> +++ b/repair/init.c
> @@ -142,6 +142,8 @@ xfs_init(libxfs_init_t *args)
> args->isreadonly = (LIBXFS_ISREADONLY | LIBXFS_ISINACTIVE);
> else if (dangerously)
> args->isreadonly = (LIBXFS_ISINACTIVE | LIBXFS_DANGEROUSLY);
> + else
> + args->isreadonly = LIBXFS_EXCLUSIVELY;
Given that we skip it for -d and -n this is fine with me.
I think we might want to delay this change in the way xfs_repair
operates until after we get a 3.0.1 release out with all the build
system fixes (hopefully really soon)
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-16 21:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-09 3:22 [PATCH] xfs_repair: open filesystem device exclusively Nathaniel W. Turner
2009-03-09 3:50 ` Nathaniel W. Turner
2009-03-16 21:23 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2009-05-07 2:46 ` Nathaniel W. Turner
2009-05-10 18:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-05-07 2:55 ` Eric Sandeen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090316212332.GA8496@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=nate@houseofnate.net \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox