From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n2H6gqL0143125 for ; Tue, 17 Mar 2009 01:43:13 -0500 Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 02:42:30 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH] XFS: Pagecache usage optimization on XFS Message-ID: <20090317064230.GA26111@infradead.org> References: <6.0.0.20.2.20090304114824.06985898@172.19.0.2> <20090316091606.GA1720@infradead.org> <6.0.0.20.2.20090317102134.06e60b30@172.19.0.2> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6.0.0.20.2.20090317102134.06e60b30@172.19.0.2> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Hisashi Hifumi Cc: Christoph Hellwig , xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com, xfs@oss.sgi.com On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 01:03:08PM +0900, Hisashi Hifumi wrote: > > At 18:16 09/03/16, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > >This looks like it should work. did you run XFSQA on a small blocksize > >filesystem with this applied? > > Hi. > I did XFSQA test on XFS partition with this patch applied. > > arch:ia64 > pagesize:16K > blocksize:2K Thanks a lot. In that case the patch is fine with me. Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig (as in reviewing the generic function to make sense with XFS :)) _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs