From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n2RG2s9Q251551 for ; Fri, 27 Mar 2009 11:03:10 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id B64841C76775 for ; Fri, 27 Mar 2009 09:02:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [18.85.46.34]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id SNQpHR0VgEvYNpz1 for ; Fri, 27 Mar 2009 09:02:09 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 12:02:04 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [patch] fix parallel build failures in xfsprogs-3.0.0 Message-ID: <20090327160204.GA9306@infradead.org> References: <200902240010.25434.vapier@gentoo.org> <200902271835.30912.agruen@suse.de> <20090304172727.GA21463@infradead.org> <200903081409.28808.agruen@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200903081409.28808.agruen@suse.de> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Andreas Gruenbacher Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Mike Frysinger , nathans@debian.org, Eric Sandeen , xfs-oss I did some make dist and build the tarball tests with acl,attr,xfsprogs & co. We still run libtoolize, aclocal and autoconf when building a clean tree. I wonder if we should just get rid of the whole configure target and require a manual ./configure like most tools? Nathan, any comments on that from the Debian perspective? _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs