From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n3I55pY4174936 for ; Sat, 18 Apr 2009 00:05:53 -0500 Received: from josefsipek.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 4BE00142F448 for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2009 22:08:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from josefsipek.net (josefsipek.net [141.211.133.196]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id ijItv6Sr0bRYG5DG for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2009 22:08:08 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 01:05:44 -0400 From: "Josef 'Jeff' Sipek" Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: add more checks to superblock validation Message-ID: <20090418050544.GQ3709@josefsipek.net> References: <1240002765-20279-1-git-send-email-felixb@sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1240002765-20279-1-git-send-email-felixb@sgi.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Felix Blyakher Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 04:12:45PM -0500, Felix Blyakher wrote: > From: Olaf Weber > > There had been reports where xfs filesystem was randomly > corrupted with fsfuzzer, and xfs failed to handle it > gracefully. This patch fixes couple of reported problem > by providing additional checks in the superblock > validation routine. > > Signed-off-by: Felix Blyakher Since this patch is from Olaf, shouldn't he have a s-o-b line as well? I'm not really familiar with this part of the code...but it looks fine to me. Josef 'Jeff' Sipek. -- Fact: 29.6% of all statistics are generated randomly. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs