From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com>
Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25])
	by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id
	n3LEEtxG131638 for <xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Tue, 21 Apr 2009 09:14:58 -0500
Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 238A322BE73
	for <xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Tue, 21 Apr 2009 07:14:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [18.85.46.34])
	by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id 6w4sxRuxPHKzuEmE for
	<xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Tue, 21 Apr 2009 07:14:52 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 10:14:51 -0400
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests: skip fsr tests if xfs_fsr utils not found
Message-ID: <20090421141451.GA26214@infradead.org>
References: <49EB8F90.20705@sandeen.net> <49EB9CC3.1000305@sandeen.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <49EB9CC3.1000305@sandeen.net>
List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI <xfs.oss.sgi.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/options/xfs>,
	<mailto:xfs-request@oss.sgi.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://oss.sgi.com/pipermail/xfs>
List-Post: <mailto:xfs@oss.sgi.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xfs-request@oss.sgi.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs>,
	<mailto:xfs-request@oss.sgi.com?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com
Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
Cc: xfs-oss <xfs@oss.sgi.com>

On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 04:50:59PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Similar to the xfsdump-related patch; gracefully fail
> if no xfs_fsr is found.
> 
> I'll probably send another for the acl & attr userspace,
> it's actually not always installed on minimal boxes.

Looks good, too.

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs