From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n3NHL0IX016739 for ; Thu, 23 Apr 2009 12:21:01 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 6D15F2369FD for ; Thu, 23 Apr 2009 10:20:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [18.85.46.34]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id bCdrT6xAm6NPm5Ky for ; Thu, 23 Apr 2009 10:20:58 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 13:20:15 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests: add aio-dio-regress tests Message-ID: <20090423171937.GE11391@infradead.org> References: <49EFB75B.5030700@sandeen.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <49EFB75B.5030700@sandeen.net> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Eric Sandeen Cc: xfs-oss On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 07:33:31PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > Think it's worth pulling this in? > Also not sure where to put it, under the top dir or under src ... > > Takes about 250s to run them all. Could break out the longer > one into a separate test so the rest could be in quick. I would prefer to have a separate test for each of the programs. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs