From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n447eLoY160752 for ; Mon, 4 May 2009 02:40:23 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 1F559146D8EE for ; Mon, 4 May 2009 00:44:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [18.85.46.34]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id txuXFIwGgpL9lQMu for ; Mon, 04 May 2009 00:44:13 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 03:40:22 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfsdump: add .gitignore Message-ID: <20090504074021.GA29449@infradead.org> References: <20090429135050.GC30808@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Timothy Shimmin Cc: Christoph Hellwig , xfs@oss.sgi.com On Mon, May 04, 2009 at 09:35:39AM +1000, Timothy Shimmin wrote: > Get rid of the symlinked files by creating a local library for the > commonality? ;-)Probably easier said than done - I haven't looked at the > code in a while - but I > I think the traditional library model is better than a heap of symlinks :) It probably is. I'll put it on my todo list.. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs