From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n486Qtev001201 for ; Fri, 8 May 2009 01:26:58 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 025A22705E9 for ; Thu, 7 May 2009 23:26:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [18.85.46.34]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id Wu8H27zBUvSyipXX for ; Thu, 07 May 2009 23:26:59 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 02:26:58 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests 042: point xfs_fsr right at the fragmented file Message-ID: <20090508062658.GA1689@infradead.org> References: <4A0386FD.7000108@sandeen.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4A0386FD.7000108@sandeen.net> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Eric Sandeen Cc: xfs-oss On Thu, May 07, 2009 at 08:12:29PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > Somehow 042 as it stands isn't actually defragging the fragmented > file we created (see 042.full post-run) > > Probably need to look into that as well, but for now this should > make the call to fsr actually _do_ something. > > This has let 2 fsr bugs slip through qa in the past few months. :( Looks good. Can you open a bugzilla for the problem of fsr not actually finding the fragmented file so that we don't forget about that one? _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs