From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n4SFZ240260824 for ; Thu, 28 May 2009 10:35:04 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id BB7872B7AAC for ; Thu, 28 May 2009 08:35:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [18.85.46.34]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id DOTFZhjeHwN3J0cd for ; Thu, 28 May 2009 08:35:17 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 11:35:17 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] Make libxfs.h optional Message-ID: <20090528153517.GA15293@infradead.org> References: <1243450413-12681-1-git-send-email-sandeen@sandeen.net> <1243450413-12681-3-git-send-email-sandeen@sandeen.net> <20090528095749.GB651@infradead.org> <4A1EA6E5.50805@sandeen.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4A1EA6E5.50805@sandeen.net> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Eric Sandeen Cc: Christoph Hellwig , xfs@oss.sgi.com On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 09:59:49AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 01:53:26PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > >> libxfs.h is really only needed for the loggen test; > >> make it config-time optional. > > > > Maybe we should just move loggen into xfsprogs? > > Perhaps, though it has no use outside of qa ... even if we do that it'll > take a while to trickle into people's xfsprogs, so any problem with > putting this patch in for now, even if we move loggen? I will send a patch to add loggen to xfsprogs ASAP. After that we can remove loggen and thus the requirement for libxfs.h from xfstests completely. The tests that use loggen would ismply check for a xfs_loggen binary in their PATH and not run, so far less drama then the current situation. > > Thanks, > -Eric > > _______________________________________________ > xfs mailing list > xfs@oss.sgi.com > http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs ---end quoted text--- _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs