From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n53HIlTH185701 for ; Wed, 3 Jun 2009 12:18:47 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 4C6E91BC8AE0 for ; Wed, 3 Jun 2009 10:19:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [18.85.46.34]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id sXnjmPHY5OaaXma7 for ; Wed, 03 Jun 2009 10:19:04 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 13:19:04 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests: Make the SCRATCH_DEV optional Message-ID: <20090603171904.GA22100@infradead.org> References: <4A26AC60.6060401@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4A26AC60.6060401@redhat.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Eric Sandeen Cc: xfs mailing list On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 12:01:20PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > Tests will fail gracefully if there is no SCRATCH_DEV defined, so change > > the check script to allow it, and update README to reflect this. > > This just makes it simpler to set up the tests, at the expense of > coverage. > > Long term it might be nice to allow either SCRATCH_DEV xor TEST_DEV > to be missing, but for now this is simple. Looks good, Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs