From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n53HokLR187158 for ; Wed, 3 Jun 2009 12:50:49 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 7561C1050FC9 for ; Wed, 3 Jun 2009 10:57:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [18.85.46.34]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id RuGbih7GEdil4fIH for ; Wed, 03 Jun 2009 10:57:38 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 13:51:03 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests: don't run 122 if required headers aren't found Message-ID: <20090603175103.GA4538@infradead.org> References: <4A26B016.2080108@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4A26B016.2080108@redhat.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Eric Sandeen Cc: xfs mailing list On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 12:17:10PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > Now that libxfs etc is optional, 122 (which compiles on the fly) > is failing if those extra headers are missing. Oh, the great 122 tests. Indeed without all the headers defining the structures we can't actually check their size. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs