From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n53NUUbh202044 for ; Wed, 3 Jun 2009 18:30:30 -0500 Received: from josefsipek.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 8135610522FC for ; Wed, 3 Jun 2009 16:37:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from josefsipek.net (josefsipek.net [141.211.133.196]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id sTwwYQuDIEezvBzM for ; Wed, 03 Jun 2009 16:37:23 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 19:30:47 -0400 From: "Josef 'Jeff' Sipek" Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/7] xfs: remove SYNC_IOWAIT Message-ID: <20090603233047.GD9167@josefsipek.net> References: <20090514171233.942489000@bombadil.infradead.org> <20090528121915.GA30037@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090528121915.GA30037@infradead.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 08:19:16AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > We want to wait for all I/O to finish when we do data integrity syncs. So > there is no reason to keep SYNC_WAIT separate from SYNC_IOWAIT. This > causes a little change in behaviour for the ENOSPC flushing code which no ^^ Typo, otherwise good. Jeff. -- My public GPG key can be found at http://www.josefsipek.net/gpg/public-0xC7958FFE.txt _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs