public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] xfs: introduce a per-ag inode iterator
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 13:17:26 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090604171726.GA13501@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A26F6B1.20509@sandeen.net>

On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 05:18:25PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Ok, it's looking for EAGAIN here, I'm assuming this is for when we are
> calling xfs_reclaim_inode_now, because...
> 
> ...
> ... because before, that's what we did above, after testing for a non-0
> return from xfs_reclaim_inode.
> 
> But xfs_reclaim_inode_now() returns 0 or the result of
> xfs_reclaim_inode, which is 0/1, so above:

Yeah.  Updated patch below that besides addressing the other comments
makes xfs_reclaim_inode return -EAGAIN if it has to skip an inode.

Subject: xfs: introduce a per-ag inode iterator
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>

From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>

Given that we walk across the per-ag inode lists so often, it makes sense to
introduce an iterator for this.

Convert the sync and reclaim code to use this new iterator, quota code will
follow in the next patch.

Also change xfs_reclaim_inode to return -EGAIN instead of 1 for an inode
already under reclaim.  This simplifies the AG iterator and doesn't
matter for the only other caller.

[hch: merged the lookup and execute callbacks back into one to get the
 pag_ici_lock locking correct and simplify the code flow]

Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

Index: xfs/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_sync.c
===================================================================
--- xfs.orig/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_sync.c	2009-06-04 12:50:25.380940755 +0200
+++ xfs/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_sync.c	2009-06-04 13:09:06.199942249 +0200
@@ -49,6 +49,123 @@
 #include <linux/freezer.h>
 
 
+STATIC xfs_inode_t *
+xfs_inode_ag_lookup(
+	struct xfs_mount	*mp,
+	struct xfs_perag	*pag,
+	uint32_t		*first_index,
+	int			tag)
+{
+	int			nr_found;
+	struct xfs_inode	*ip;
+
+	/*
+	 * use a gang lookup to find the next inode in the tree
+	 * as the tree is sparse and a gang lookup walks to find
+	 * the number of objects requested.
+	 */
+	read_lock(&pag->pag_ici_lock);
+	if (tag == -1) {
+		nr_found = radix_tree_gang_lookup(&pag->pag_ici_root,
+				(void **)&ip, *first_index, 1);
+	} else {
+		nr_found = radix_tree_gang_lookup_tag(&pag->pag_ici_root,
+				(void **)&ip, *first_index, 1, tag);
+	}
+	if (!nr_found)
+		goto unlock;
+
+	/*
+	 * Update the index for the next lookup. Catch overflows
+	 * into the next AG range which can occur if we have inodes
+	 * in the last block of the AG and we are currently
+	 * pointing to the last inode.
+	 */
+	*first_index = XFS_INO_TO_AGINO(mp, ip->i_ino + 1);
+	if (*first_index < XFS_INO_TO_AGINO(mp, ip->i_ino))
+		goto unlock;
+
+	return ip;
+
+unlock:
+	read_unlock(&pag->pag_ici_lock);
+	return NULL;
+}
+
+STATIC int
+xfs_inode_ag_walk(
+	struct xfs_mount	*mp,
+	xfs_agnumber_t		ag,
+	int			(*execute)(struct xfs_inode *ip,
+					   struct xfs_perag *pag, int flags),
+	int			flags,
+	int			tag)
+{
+	struct xfs_perag	*pag = &mp->m_perag[ag];
+	uint32_t		first_index;
+	int			last_error = 0;
+	int			skipped;
+
+restart:
+	skipped = 0;
+	first_index = 0;
+	do {
+		int		error = 0;
+		xfs_inode_t	*ip;
+
+		ip = xfs_inode_ag_lookup(mp, pag, &first_index, tag);
+		if (!ip)
+			break;
+
+		error = execute(ip, pag, flags);
+		if (error == EAGAIN) {
+			skipped++;
+			continue;
+		}
+		if (error)
+			last_error = error;
+		/*
+		 * bail out if the filesystem is corrupted.
+		 */
+		if (error == EFSCORRUPTED)
+			break;
+
+	} while (1);
+
+	if (skipped) {
+		delay(1);
+		goto restart;
+	}
+
+	xfs_put_perag(mp, pag);
+	return last_error;
+}
+
+STATIC int
+xfs_inode_ag_iterator(
+	struct xfs_mount	*mp,
+	int			(*execute)(struct xfs_inode *ip,
+					   struct xfs_perag *pag, int flags),
+	int			flags,
+	int			tag)
+{
+	int			error = 0;
+	int			last_error = 0;
+	xfs_agnumber_t		ag;
+
+	for (ag = 0; ag < mp->m_sb.sb_agcount; ag++) {
+		if (!mp->m_perag[ag].pag_ici_init)
+			continue;
+		error = xfs_inode_ag_walk(mp, ag, execute, flags, tag);
+		if (error) {
+			last_error = error;
+			if (error == EFSCORRUPTED)
+				break;
+		}
+	}
+	return XFS_ERROR(last_error);
+}
+
 /* must be called with pag_ici_lock held and releases it */
 STATIC int
 xfs_sync_inode_valid(
@@ -85,12 +202,17 @@ xfs_sync_inode_valid(
 STATIC int
 xfs_sync_inode_data(
 	struct xfs_inode	*ip,
+	struct xfs_perag	*pag,
 	int			flags)
 {
 	struct inode		*inode = VFS_I(ip);
 	struct address_space *mapping = inode->i_mapping;
 	int			error = 0;
 
+	error = xfs_sync_inode_valid(ip, pag);
+	if (error)
+		return error;
+
 	if (!mapping_tagged(mapping, PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY))
 		goto out_wait;
 
@@ -107,16 +229,22 @@ xfs_sync_inode_data(
  out_wait:
 	if (flags & SYNC_IOWAIT)
 		xfs_ioend_wait(ip);
+	IRELE(ip);
 	return error;
 }
 
 STATIC int
 xfs_sync_inode_attr(
 	struct xfs_inode	*ip,
+	struct xfs_perag	*pag,
 	int			flags)
 {
 	int			error = 0;
 
+	error = xfs_sync_inode_valid(ip, pag);
+	if (error)
+		return error;
+
 	xfs_ilock(ip, XFS_ILOCK_SHARED);
 	if (xfs_inode_clean(ip))
 		goto out_unlock;
@@ -136,117 +264,33 @@ xfs_sync_inode_attr(
 
  out_unlock:
 	xfs_iunlock(ip, XFS_ILOCK_SHARED);
+	IRELE(ip);
 	return error;
 }
 
-/*
- * Sync all the inodes in the given AG according to the
- * direction given by the flags.
- */
-STATIC int
-xfs_sync_inodes_ag(
-	xfs_mount_t	*mp,
-	int		ag,
-	int		flags)
-{
-	xfs_perag_t	*pag = &mp->m_perag[ag];
-	int		nr_found;
-	uint32_t	first_index = 0;
-	int		error = 0;
-	int		last_error = 0;
-
-	do {
-		xfs_inode_t	*ip = NULL;
-
-		/*
-		 * use a gang lookup to find the next inode in the tree
-		 * as the tree is sparse and a gang lookup walks to find
-		 * the number of objects requested.
-		 */
-		read_lock(&pag->pag_ici_lock);
-		nr_found = radix_tree_gang_lookup(&pag->pag_ici_root,
-				(void**)&ip, first_index, 1);
-
-		if (!nr_found) {
-			read_unlock(&pag->pag_ici_lock);
-			break;
-		}
-
-		/*
-		 * Update the index for the next lookup. Catch overflows
-		 * into the next AG range which can occur if we have inodes
-		 * in the last block of the AG and we are currently
-		 * pointing to the last inode.
-		 */
-		first_index = XFS_INO_TO_AGINO(mp, ip->i_ino + 1);
-		if (first_index < XFS_INO_TO_AGINO(mp, ip->i_ino)) {
-			read_unlock(&pag->pag_ici_lock);
-			break;
-		}
-
-		error = xfs_sync_inode_valid(ip, pag);
-		if (error) {
-			if (error == EFSCORRUPTED)
-				return 0;
-			continue;
-		}
-
-		/*
-		 * If we have to flush data or wait for I/O completion
-		 * we need to hold the iolock.
-		 */
-		if (flags & SYNC_DELWRI)
-			error = xfs_sync_inode_data(ip, flags);
-
-		if (flags & SYNC_ATTR)
-			error = xfs_sync_inode_attr(ip, flags);
-
-		IRELE(ip);
-
-		if (error)
-			last_error = error;
-		/*
-		 * bail out if the filesystem is corrupted.
-		 */
-		if (error == EFSCORRUPTED)
-			return XFS_ERROR(error);
-
-	} while (nr_found);
-
-	return last_error;
-}
-
 int
 xfs_sync_inodes(
 	xfs_mount_t	*mp,
 	int		flags)
 {
-	int		error;
-	int		last_error;
-	int		i;
+	int		error = 0;
 	int		lflags = XFS_LOG_FORCE;
 
 	if (mp->m_flags & XFS_MOUNT_RDONLY)
 		return 0;
-	error = 0;
-	last_error = 0;
 
 	if (flags & SYNC_WAIT)
 		lflags |= XFS_LOG_SYNC;
 
-	for (i = 0; i < mp->m_sb.sb_agcount; i++) {
-		if (!mp->m_perag[i].pag_ici_init)
-			continue;
-		error = xfs_sync_inodes_ag(mp, i, flags);
-		if (error)
-			last_error = error;
-		if (error == EFSCORRUPTED)
-			break;
-	}
 	if (flags & SYNC_DELWRI)
-		xfs_log_force(mp, 0, lflags);
+		error = xfs_inode_ag_iterator(mp, xfs_sync_inode_data, flags, -1);
 
-	return XFS_ERROR(last_error);
+	if (flags & SYNC_ATTR)
+		error = xfs_inode_ag_iterator(mp, xfs_sync_inode_attr, flags, -1);
+
+	if (!error && (flags & SYNC_DELWRI))
+		xfs_log_force(mp, 0, lflags);
+	return XFS_ERROR(error);
 }
 
 STATIC int
@@ -613,7 +657,7 @@ xfs_reclaim_inode(
 			xfs_ifunlock(ip);
 			xfs_iunlock(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL);
 		}
-		return 1;
+		return -EAGAIN;
 	}
 	__xfs_iflags_set(ip, XFS_IRECLAIM);
 	spin_unlock(&ip->i_flags_lock);
@@ -698,72 +742,20 @@ xfs_inode_clear_reclaim_tag(
 	xfs_put_perag(mp, pag);
 }
 
-
-STATIC void
-xfs_reclaim_inodes_ag(
-	xfs_mount_t	*mp,
-	int		ag,
-	int		mode)
+STATIC int
+xfs_reclaim_inode_now(
+	struct xfs_inode	*ip,
+	struct xfs_perag	*pag,
+	int			flags)
 {
-	xfs_inode_t	*ip = NULL;
-	xfs_perag_t	*pag = &mp->m_perag[ag];
-	int		nr_found;
-	uint32_t	first_index;
-	int		skipped;
-
-restart:
-	first_index = 0;
-	skipped = 0;
-	do {
-		/*
-		 * use a gang lookup to find the next inode in the tree
-		 * as the tree is sparse and a gang lookup walks to find
-		 * the number of objects requested.
-		 */
-		read_lock(&pag->pag_ici_lock);
-		nr_found = radix_tree_gang_lookup_tag(&pag->pag_ici_root,
-					(void**)&ip, first_index, 1,
-					XFS_ICI_RECLAIM_TAG);
-
-		if (!nr_found) {
-			read_unlock(&pag->pag_ici_lock);
-			break;
-		}
-
-		/*
-		 * Update the index for the next lookup. Catch overflows
-		 * into the next AG range which can occur if we have inodes
-		 * in the last block of the AG and we are currently
-		 * pointing to the last inode.
-		 */
-		first_index = XFS_INO_TO_AGINO(mp, ip->i_ino + 1);
-		if (first_index < XFS_INO_TO_AGINO(mp, ip->i_ino)) {
-			read_unlock(&pag->pag_ici_lock);
-			break;
-		}
-
-		/* ignore if already under reclaim */
-		if (xfs_iflags_test(ip, XFS_IRECLAIM)) {
-			read_unlock(&pag->pag_ici_lock);
-			continue;
-		}
-
+	/* ignore if already under reclaim */
+	if (xfs_iflags_test(ip, XFS_IRECLAIM)) {
 		read_unlock(&pag->pag_ici_lock);
-
-		/*
-		 * hmmm - this is an inode already in reclaim. Do
-		 * we even bother catching it here?
-		 */
-		if (xfs_reclaim_inode(ip, 0, mode))
-			skipped++;
-	} while (nr_found);
-
-	if (skipped) {
-		delay(1);
-		goto restart;
+		return 0;
 	}
-	return;
+	read_unlock(&pag->pag_ici_lock);
 
+	return xfs_reclaim_inode(ip, 0, flags);
 }
 
 int
@@ -771,14 +763,6 @@ xfs_reclaim_inodes(
 	xfs_mount_t	*mp,
 	int		mode)
 {
-	int		i;
-
-	for (i = 0; i < mp->m_sb.sb_agcount; i++) {
-		if (!mp->m_perag[i].pag_ici_init)
-			continue;
-		xfs_reclaim_inodes_ag(mp, i, mode);
-	}
-	return 0;
+	return xfs_inode_ag_iterator(mp, xfs_reclaim_inode_now, mode,
+					XFS_ICI_RECLAIM_TAG);
 }
-
-

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  reply	other threads:[~2009-06-04 17:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-05-14 17:12 [PATCH 0/7] inode sync refactoring Christoph Hellwig
2009-05-14 17:12 ` [PATCH 1/7] xfs: split inode data writeback from xfs_sync_inodes_ag Christoph Hellwig
2009-05-15  4:49   ` Sujit Karataparambil
2009-05-15 17:21     ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-05-18  6:58       ` Dave Chinner
2009-05-26 20:14   ` Eric Sandeen
2009-05-14 17:12 ` [PATCH 2/7] xfs: split inode flushing " Christoph Hellwig
2009-05-15  4:52   ` Sujit Karataparambil
2009-05-15 17:22     ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-05-26 20:45   ` Eric Sandeen
2009-05-27 10:58     ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-05-27 20:11       ` Eric Sandeen
2009-05-14 17:12 ` [PATCH 3/7] xfs: factor out inode validation for sync Christoph Hellwig
2009-05-27 20:38   ` Eric Sandeen
2009-05-14 17:12 ` [PATCH 4/7] xfs: remove unused parameter from xfs_reclaim_inodes Christoph Hellwig
2009-05-27 20:44   ` Eric Sandeen
2009-05-14 17:12 ` [PATCH 5/7] xfs: introduce a per-ag inode iterator Christoph Hellwig
2009-06-03 22:01   ` Eric Sandeen
2009-06-04 11:00     ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-06-03 22:18   ` Eric Sandeen
2009-06-04 17:17     ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2009-06-05 18:18       ` Eric Sandeen
2009-05-14 17:12 ` [PATCH 6/7] xfs: use generic inode iterator in xfs_qm_dqrele_all_inodes Christoph Hellwig
2009-06-03 23:29   ` Josef 'Jeff' Sipek
2009-06-05 19:15   ` Eric Sandeen
2009-06-05 19:17     ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-06-05 20:11       ` Eric Sandeen
2009-05-14 17:12 ` [PATCH 7/7] xfs: split xfs_sync_inodes Christoph Hellwig
2009-06-03 23:26   ` Josef 'Jeff' Sipek
2009-06-04 10:45     ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-06-05 20:32   ` Eric Sandeen
2009-05-28 12:19 ` [PATCH 8/7] xfs: remove SYNC_IOWAIT Christoph Hellwig
2009-06-03 23:30   ` Josef 'Jeff' Sipek
2009-06-04 10:46     ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-06-05 20:37   ` Eric Sandeen
2009-05-28 12:19 ` [PATCH 9/7] xfs: remove SYNC_BDFLUSH Christoph Hellwig
2009-05-29 13:19   ` Sujit Karataparambil
2009-05-29 20:10     ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-05-30  8:27       ` Sujit Karataparambil
2009-06-05 20:45   ` Eric Sandeen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090604171726.GA13501@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=sandeen@sandeen.net \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox