From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n55Lcr98065585 for ; Fri, 5 Jun 2009 16:38:53 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 549281228BA2 for ; Fri, 5 Jun 2009 14:39:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [18.85.46.34]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id 0ZmTFKW8VGu7YkTt for ; Fri, 05 Jun 2009 14:39:11 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 17:39:11 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH xfstests: Make "new" script insert appropriate license on tests Message-ID: <20090605213910.GA7315@infradead.org> References: <4A298B82.3050903@sandeen.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4A298B82.3050903@sandeen.net> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Eric Sandeen Cc: xfs mailing list On Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 04:17:54PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > Don't default to SGI copyright, someone else may be > making this test... Ah nice one. Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig Mabe it's also time to audit new if actually creates a skeleton up to the latest standards for test cases? _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs