From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n58GGQlI237151 for ; Mon, 8 Jun 2009 11:16:26 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id A25241234F94 for ; Mon, 8 Jun 2009 09:16:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [18.85.46.34]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id ERtewA31sILQHLJb for ; Mon, 08 Jun 2009 09:16:46 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 12:16:46 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests: Allow fsx tests to run on generic filesystems Message-ID: <20090608161646.GA14861@infradead.org> References: <4A2D31E3.3090108@sandeen.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4A2D31E3.3090108@sandeen.net> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Eric Sandeen Cc: xfs mailing list On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 10:44:35AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > There is already logic in 075 to gracefully skip nfs for fsx > invocations with -x (xfs-specific preallocation) - just extend > this to any non-xfs filesystem, and add to test 112 as well. > > Later we can change this behavior to use fallocate and include > more filesystems but this gets some fsx coverage for now. > > Test 127 doesn't seem to have anything xfs-specific, so mark > that as generic too. Good bandaid for now, but it would be even better to get a fsx version using the generic prealloc calls one day :) Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs