From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n5AIrvHk107392 for ; Wed, 10 Jun 2009 13:53:59 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id DD8E91D3D230 for ; Wed, 10 Jun 2009 11:54:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [18.85.46.34]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id poGG7imNvjF5JU3O for ; Wed, 10 Jun 2009 11:54:18 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 14:54:18 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests: Gracefully fail aio tests if they weren't built Message-ID: <20090610185418.GA24615@infradead.org> References: <4A2FF40F.1090808@sandeen.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4A2FF40F.1090808@sandeen.net> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Eric Sandeen Cc: xfs-oss On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 12:57:35PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > Gracefully fail aio tests if they weren't built > > configure & make succeeds w/o aio headers or libs, > so tests should handle that. > > Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen Maybe we should just add an _require_aio to check for libaio instead of needing different checks in each test? _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs