From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n5KH1wbl125933 for ; Sat, 20 Jun 2009 12:02:00 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 664CD30E681 for ; Sat, 20 Jun 2009 10:02:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [18.85.46.34]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id Mzhf9aVZQqkdzl5S for ; Sat, 20 Jun 2009 10:02:23 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 13:02:22 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Skip _check_test_fs unless a test is actually run Message-ID: <20090620170222.GA5508@infradead.org> References: <1245434013-9433-1-git-send-email-tytso@mit.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1245434013-9433-1-git-send-email-tytso@mit.edu> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Theodore Ts'o Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 01:53:31PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > Running _check_test_fs can take a non-trivial amount of time, and if a > test has been skipped because it doesn't work on Linux, or it doesn't > work of for ext4, it's pointless to re-run _check_test_fs. So move > the call to _check_test_fs so it is only run if a test is actually run. Thanks, I've put this in. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs