From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n5NGZM9b037111 for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2009 11:35:23 -0500 Received: from enyo.dsw2k3.info (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 1D56A97EDFA for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2009 09:44:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from enyo.dsw2k3.info (enyo.dsw2k3.info [195.71.86.239]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id MeBF0DERdz7qW75J for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2009 09:44:10 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 18:35:35 +0200 From: Matthias Schniedermeyer Subject: Re: XFS and atime update strangeness Message-ID: <20090623163535.GA12551@citd.de> References: <4A3B5C14.9070101@dermichi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Felix Blyakher Cc: Michael Weissenbacher , xfs@oss.sgi.com On 23.06.2009 10:01, Felix Blyakher wrote: > On Jun 19, 2009, at 4:36 AM, Michael Weissenbacher wrote: > >> Is there any way to enable permanent atime updates in case someone >> wants them? > > That's another good request I'd like to address as well. The > above mentioned patch just makes it behave as relatime. Just to have it explictly mentioned a.k.a. just for the record. strictatime is AWOL. With current 2.6.30 you just can't have 'atime' because default was changed to 'relatime' and the former default got the new option 'strictatime'(*). But if i want to mount a XFS-filesystem strictatime: XFS: unknown mount option [strictatime] *: According to fs/namespace.c, line 795 and following these 4 atime-related options appear to be allowed: { MNT_NOATIME, ",noatime" }, { MNT_NODIRATIME, ",nodiratime" }, { MNT_RELATIME, ",relatime" }, { MNT_STRICTATIME, ",strictatime" }, Bis denn -- Real Programmers consider "what you see is what you get" to be just as bad a concept in Text Editors as it is in women. No, the Real Programmer wants a "you asked for it, you got it" text editor -- complicated, cryptic, powerful, unforgiving, dangerous. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs