From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Patrick Schreurs <patrick@news-service.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com, Tommy van Leeuwen <tommy@news-service.com>,
Lachlan McIlroy <lmcilroy@redhat.com>,
Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
Subject: Re: 2.6.30 panic - xfs_fs_destroy_inode
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 08:44:41 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090701124441.GA12844@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A4A7205.6010101@news-service.com>
Actually you might want to give this patch a try which fixes a race
affecting the reclaim tag in iget:
Index: xfs/fs/xfs/xfs_iget.c
===================================================================
--- xfs.orig/fs/xfs/xfs_iget.c 2009-06-04 13:27:41.901946950 +0200
+++ xfs/fs/xfs/xfs_iget.c 2009-06-04 14:08:08.837816707 +0200
@@ -132,80 +132,89 @@ xfs_iget_cache_hit(
int flags,
int lock_flags) __releases(pag->pag_ici_lock)
{
+ struct inode *inode = VFS_I(ip);
struct xfs_mount *mp = ip->i_mount;
- int error = EAGAIN;
+ int error;
+
+ spin_lock(&ip->i_flags_lock);
/*
- * If INEW is set this inode is being set up
- * If IRECLAIM is set this inode is being torn down
- * Pause and try again.
+ * This inode is being torn down, pause and try again.
*/
- if (xfs_iflags_test(ip, (XFS_INEW|XFS_IRECLAIM))) {
+ if (ip->i_flags & XFS_IRECLAIM) {
XFS_STATS_INC(xs_ig_frecycle);
+ error = EAGAIN;
goto out_error;
}
- /* If IRECLAIMABLE is set, we've torn down the vfs inode part */
- if (xfs_iflags_test(ip, XFS_IRECLAIMABLE)) {
+ /*
+ * If we are racing with another cache hit that is currently recycling
+ * this inode out of the XFS_IRECLAIMABLE state, wait for the
+ * initialisation to complete before continuing.
+ */
+ if (ip->i_flags & XFS_INEW) {
+ spin_unlock(&ip->i_flags_lock);
+ read_unlock(&pag->pag_ici_lock);
- /*
- * If lookup is racing with unlink, then we should return an
- * error immediately so we don't remove it from the reclaim
- * list and potentially leak the inode.
- */
- if ((ip->i_d.di_mode == 0) && !(flags & XFS_IGET_CREATE)) {
- error = ENOENT;
- goto out_error;
- }
+ XFS_STATS_INC(xs_ig_frecycle);
+ wait_on_inode(inode);
+ return EAGAIN;
+ }
+ /*
+ * If lookup is racing with unlink, then we should return an
+ * error immediately so we don't remove it from the reclaim
+ * list and potentially leak the inode.
+ */
+ if (ip->i_d.di_mode == 0 && !(flags & XFS_IGET_CREATE)) {
+ error = ENOENT;
+ goto out_error;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * If IRECLAIMABLE is set, we've torn down the vfs inode part already.
+ * Need to carefully get it back into useable state.
+ */
+ if (ip->i_flags & XFS_IRECLAIMABLE) {
xfs_itrace_exit_tag(ip, "xfs_iget.alloc");
/*
- * We need to re-initialise the VFS inode as it has been
- * 'freed' by the VFS. Do this here so we can deal with
- * errors cleanly, then tag it so it can be set up correctly
- * later.
+ * We need to set XFS_INEW atomically with clearing the
+ * reclaimable tag so that we do have an indicator of the
+ * inode still being initialized.
*/
- if (!inode_init_always(mp->m_super, VFS_I(ip))) {
+ ip->i_flags |= XFS_INEW;
+ __xfs_inode_clear_reclaim_tag(pag, ip);
+
+ spin_unlock(&ip->i_flags_lock);
+ read_unlock(&pag->pag_ici_lock);
+
+ if (unlikely(!inode_init_always(mp->m_super, inode))) {
+ printk("node_init_always failed!!\n");
+
+ /*
+ * Re-initializing the inode failed, and we are in deep
+ * trouble. Try to re-add it to the reclaim list.
+ */
+ read_lock(&pag->pag_ici_lock);
+ spin_lock(&ip->i_flags_lock);
+
+ ip->i_flags &= ~XFS_INEW;
+ __xfs_inode_set_reclaim_tag(pag, ip);
+
error = ENOMEM;
goto out_error;
}
-
- /*
- * We must set the XFS_INEW flag before clearing the
- * XFS_IRECLAIMABLE flag so that if a racing lookup does
- * not find the XFS_IRECLAIMABLE above but has the igrab()
- * below succeed we can safely check XFS_INEW to detect
- * that this inode is still being initialised.
- */
- xfs_iflags_set(ip, XFS_INEW);
- xfs_iflags_clear(ip, XFS_IRECLAIMABLE);
-
- /* clear the radix tree reclaim flag as well. */
- __xfs_inode_clear_reclaim_tag(mp, pag, ip);
- } else if (!igrab(VFS_I(ip))) {
+ } else {
/* If the VFS inode is being torn down, pause and try again. */
- XFS_STATS_INC(xs_ig_frecycle);
- goto out_error;
- } else if (xfs_iflags_test(ip, XFS_INEW)) {
- /*
- * We are racing with another cache hit that is
- * currently recycling this inode out of the XFS_IRECLAIMABLE
- * state. Wait for the initialisation to complete before
- * continuing.
- */
- wait_on_inode(VFS_I(ip));
- }
+ if (!igrab(inode))
+ goto out_error;
- if (ip->i_d.di_mode == 0 && !(flags & XFS_IGET_CREATE)) {
- error = ENOENT;
- iput(VFS_I(ip));
- goto out_error;
+ /* We've got a live one. */
+ spin_unlock(&ip->i_flags_lock);
+ read_unlock(&pag->pag_ici_lock);
}
- /* We've got a live one. */
- read_unlock(&pag->pag_ici_lock);
-
if (lock_flags != 0)
xfs_ilock(ip, lock_flags);
@@ -215,6 +224,7 @@ xfs_iget_cache_hit(
return 0;
out_error:
+ spin_unlock(&ip->i_flags_lock);
read_unlock(&pag->pag_ici_lock);
return error;
}
Index: xfs/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_sync.c
===================================================================
--- xfs.orig/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_sync.c 2009-06-04 13:40:09.135939715 +0200
+++ xfs/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_sync.c 2009-06-04 13:59:17.978816696 +0200
@@ -607,6 +607,17 @@ xfs_reclaim_inode(
return 0;
}
+void
+__xfs_inode_set_reclaim_tag(
+ struct xfs_perag *pag,
+ struct xfs_inode *ip)
+{
+ xfs_agino_t agino = XFS_INO_TO_AGINO(ip->i_mount, ip->i_ino);
+
+ radix_tree_tag_set(&pag->pag_ici_root, agino, XFS_ICI_RECLAIM_TAG);
+ __xfs_iflags_set(ip, XFS_IRECLAIMABLE);
+}
+
/*
* We set the inode flag atomically with the radix tree tag.
* Once we get tag lookups on the radix tree, this inode flag
@@ -621,9 +632,7 @@ xfs_inode_set_reclaim_tag(
read_lock(&pag->pag_ici_lock);
spin_lock(&ip->i_flags_lock);
- radix_tree_tag_set(&pag->pag_ici_root,
- XFS_INO_TO_AGINO(mp, ip->i_ino), XFS_ICI_RECLAIM_TAG);
- __xfs_iflags_set(ip, XFS_IRECLAIMABLE);
+ __xfs_inode_set_reclaim_tag(pag, ip);
spin_unlock(&ip->i_flags_lock);
read_unlock(&pag->pag_ici_lock);
xfs_put_perag(mp, pag);
@@ -631,30 +640,15 @@ xfs_inode_set_reclaim_tag(
void
__xfs_inode_clear_reclaim_tag(
- xfs_mount_t *mp,
- xfs_perag_t *pag,
- xfs_inode_t *ip)
-{
- radix_tree_tag_clear(&pag->pag_ici_root,
- XFS_INO_TO_AGINO(mp, ip->i_ino), XFS_ICI_RECLAIM_TAG);
-}
-
-void
-xfs_inode_clear_reclaim_tag(
- xfs_inode_t *ip)
+ struct xfs_perag *pag,
+ struct xfs_inode *ip)
{
- xfs_mount_t *mp = ip->i_mount;
- xfs_perag_t *pag = xfs_get_perag(mp, ip->i_ino);
+ xfs_agino_t agino = XFS_INO_TO_AGINO(ip->i_mount, ip->i_ino);
- read_lock(&pag->pag_ici_lock);
- spin_lock(&ip->i_flags_lock);
- __xfs_inode_clear_reclaim_tag(mp, pag, ip);
- spin_unlock(&ip->i_flags_lock);
- read_unlock(&pag->pag_ici_lock);
- xfs_put_perag(mp, pag);
+ ip->i_flags &= ~XFS_IRECLAIMABLE;
+ radix_tree_tag_clear(&pag->pag_ici_root, agino, XFS_ICI_RECLAIM_TAG);
}
-
STATIC void
xfs_reclaim_inodes_ag(
xfs_mount_t *mp,
Index: xfs/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_sync.h
===================================================================
--- xfs.orig/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_sync.h 2009-06-04 13:53:32.994814723 +0200
+++ xfs/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_sync.h 2009-06-04 13:58:54.746942001 +0200
@@ -51,7 +51,6 @@ int xfs_reclaim_inode(struct xfs_inode *
int xfs_reclaim_inodes(struct xfs_mount *mp, int noblock, int mode);
void xfs_inode_set_reclaim_tag(struct xfs_inode *ip);
-void xfs_inode_clear_reclaim_tag(struct xfs_inode *ip);
-void __xfs_inode_clear_reclaim_tag(struct xfs_mount *mp, struct xfs_perag *pag,
- struct xfs_inode *ip);
+void __xfs_inode_set_reclaim_tag(struct xfs_perag *pag, struct xfs_inode *ip);
+void __xfs_inode_clear_reclaim_tag(struct xfs_perag *pag, struct xfs_inode *ip);
#endif
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-01 12:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-17 17:04 2.6.30 panic - xfs_fs_destroy_inode Patrick Schreurs
2009-06-17 21:31 ` Eric Sandeen
2009-06-18 7:55 ` Patrick Schreurs
2009-06-20 10:18 ` Patrick Schreurs
2009-06-20 13:29 ` Eric Sandeen
2009-06-20 16:31 ` Patrick Schreurs
2009-06-23 7:24 ` Patrick Schreurs
2009-06-23 8:17 ` Lachlan McIlroy
2009-06-23 17:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-06-30 20:13 ` Patrick Schreurs
2009-06-30 20:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-07-20 19:19 ` Patrick Schreurs
2009-07-20 20:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-07-01 12:44 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2009-07-02 7:09 ` Tommy van Leeuwen
2009-07-02 17:31 ` Patrick Schreurs
2009-07-21 14:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-07-22 8:55 ` Tommy van Leeuwen
2009-08-17 21:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-08-20 12:24 ` Tommy van Leeuwen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090701124441.GA12844@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=lmcilroy@redhat.com \
--cc=patrick@news-service.com \
--cc=sandeen@sandeen.net \
--cc=tommy@news-service.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox