From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n67AhSoO139652 for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 05:43:28 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id D8DC11AFE537 for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2009 03:44:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [18.85.46.34]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id 9FHzLxG4rYMybQb3 for ; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 03:44:03 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 06:44:03 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests: add tests to check log size scaling Message-ID: <20090707104403.GA21747@infradead.org> References: <20090705194111.GA3834@infradead.org> <4A52CAD6.1070807@sandeen.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4A52CAD6.1070807@sandeen.net> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Eric Sandeen Cc: Christoph Hellwig , xfs@oss.sgi.com On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 11:11:02PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > Any reason to do this on the scratch dir vs. the test dir? (Since > scratch dir became optional, I figure stuff that can go on the test dev > instead, probably should?) > > not a big deal, it looks fine otherwise. The test should work just fine using the test dir, and given that these bits all cam from Dave I can't speak for his reason to use the scratch dir. But given that even creating an empty 16TB filesystem uses up a lot of space I'd rather have as much as possible free space available instead of sharing it with an aged filesystem. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs