From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n6K0FvSF002589 for ; Sun, 19 Jul 2009 19:15:57 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 1DC5C13B3141 for ; Sun, 19 Jul 2009 17:16:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [18.85.46.34]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id Nz6Ey3w4xd7u5tvA for ; Sun, 19 Jul 2009 17:16:38 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2009 20:16:37 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: xfstests: nslookup not found Message-ID: <20090720001637.GA31674@infradead.org> References: <20090719182012.GA10936@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christian Kujau Cc: Christoph Hellwig , linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 04:57:19PM -0700, Christian Kujau wrote: > On Sun, 19 Jul 2009 at 14:20, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > Can you resend a patch that just moves _get_fqdn and the check for > > nslookup from common* into the "new" script? > > If I understand correctly, maybe something like this would be acceptable? > > I was tempted to use "hostname -f" to give out the fqdn, but appaerently > not every hostname knows "-f" and I did not want to let the whole script > fail just because nslookup is not in place. Yes, that's exactly it. Can you resend it with a proper subject, description and add your Signed-off-by tag? _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs