* xfs project quota question
@ 2009-07-30 9:49 Erik Gulliksson
2009-07-30 15:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Erik Gulliksson @ 2009-07-30 9:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xfs mailing list
Hi,
We have recently started to use XFS for our production storage servers
(coming from ZFS and Lustre/ext3) and are now considering activating
project quota on quite massive scale. For our setup there would be
between 10k and 100k "project directories" per filesystem, each with
up to 1T data and up to 1M number of files. Would this even be
feasible to consider? Have anyone done any tests with a big number of
project quotas for an xfs file system? How well does it scale?
Best regards
Erik Gulliksson
--
Erik Gulliksson, erik.gulliksson@diino.net
System Administrator, Diino AB
http://www.diino.com
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: xfs project quota question
2009-07-30 9:49 xfs project quota question Erik Gulliksson
@ 2009-07-30 15:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2009-07-30 15:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Erik Gulliksson; +Cc: xfs mailing list
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 11:49:54AM +0200, Erik Gulliksson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have recently started to use XFS for our production storage servers
> (coming from ZFS and Lustre/ext3) and are now considering activating
> project quota on quite massive scale. For our setup there would be
> between 10k and 100k "project directories" per filesystem, each with
> up to 1T data and up to 1M number of files. Would this even be
> feasible to consider? Have anyone done any tests with a big number of
> project quotas for an xfs file system? How well does it scale?
Project quotas scale exactly the same way as user or group quotas. 10k
different IDs defintively should be fine. 100k different IDs might run
into scaling problems with the in-core quota hash, but that's something
only limited by choice of a hash-table for the in-memory lookup and
could be easily fixed by switching to a smarter data structure which we
could fix short-term given sufficient enough interest.
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-07-30 15:31 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-07-30 9:49 xfs project quota question Erik Gulliksson
2009-07-30 15:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox