From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n7AG8G1a068824 for ; Mon, 10 Aug 2009 11:08:16 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 562723B947C for ; Mon, 10 Aug 2009 09:09:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [18.85.46.34]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id vDGUZMCjL2WAUhBY for ; Mon, 10 Aug 2009 09:09:10 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 12:09:08 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] xfstests: 220 - generic quota sanity Message-ID: <20090810160908.GA17332@infradead.org> References: <4A7C7C1C.2010202@redhat.com> <4A803162.8020806@sandeen.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4A803162.8020806@sandeen.net> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Eric Sandeen Cc: Eric Sandeen , xfs-oss On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 09:40:34AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > Add some very basic quota sanity tests for generic filesystems. > > This is based on test 108, but uses the generic quota tools, > not xfs_quota, and therefore cannot test project quota. > > Also, the IOs are much smaller (48k) so that ext3 won't get into > indirect blocks and throw off the accounting. This does > assume 4k blocks though. Looks good to me and passes at least for XFS. Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs