From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n7AG8wdr068881 for ; Mon, 10 Aug 2009 11:08:58 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id A3DCBB22B55 for ; Mon, 10 Aug 2009 09:19:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [18.85.46.34]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id GbKchg0JQVbu8MU0 for ; Mon, 10 Aug 2009 09:19:47 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 12:09:49 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests: 220 - generic quota sanity Message-ID: <20090810160949.GA21948@infradead.org> References: <1871149413.1673471249881207275.JavaMail.root@zmail05.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> <4A80291D.6020200@sandeen.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4A80291D.6020200@sandeen.net> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Eric Sandeen Cc: Eric Sandeen , ext4 development , Lachlan McIlroy , xfs-oss On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 09:05:17AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > Lachlan McIlroy wrote: > > This looks good Eric. > > > > Is this test just for quota accounting or should it be testing quota > > enforcement too? > > I guess 108 just did accounting; I was going to keep it parallel, and do > a different one for accounting, but it could be added to this as well. Yeah, let's use a different one for enforement testing. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs