From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n7G2MkYT220171 for ; Sat, 15 Aug 2009 21:23:02 -0500 Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 22:23:31 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: Kernel 2.6.30.4 XFS(..?) regression (happened again) Message-ID: <20090816022331.GA2309@infradead.org> References: <00980BBF-1206-4BEF-A8AE-B4A8DAE7EC27@sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Justin Piszcz Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com All your traces seem to have in common that you're block on locks hold by processed doing I/O. Especially a lot of page locks which are controlled by the VM and not the filesystem. Can you try with commit 8aa7e847d834ed937a9ad37a0f2ad5b8584c1ab0 from 2.6.31-rc applied, or better directly 2.6.3-rc6? I would be surprised if this is something inside XFS, but running with CONFIG_XFS_DEBUG never hurts. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs