From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n7MEPLI0254239 for ; Sat, 22 Aug 2009 09:25:38 -0500 Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 10:25:50 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: Kernel 2.6.30.4 XFS(..?) regression (& with/2.6.31-rc6) Message-ID: <20090822142550.GA10003@infradead.org> References: <00980BBF-1206-4BEF-A8AE-B4A8DAE7EC27@sgi.com> <20090816022331.GA2309@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Justin Piszcz Cc: Christoph Hellwig , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 06:27:30AM -0400, Justin Piszcz wrote: > > > On Mon, 17 Aug 2009, Justin Piszcz wrote: > >> >> >> On Sat, 15 Aug 2009, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >> > > On this system, I am running loop-aes, could that be the culprit? On all > other systems not using loop-aes with 2.6.30.x, I do not see this issue. Yes, entirely possible. All the crypto loop / dm implementation used to have a tendency to never complete I/O once in a while, although that didn't happen anymore recently. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs