From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n7MKvO69014531 for ; Sat, 22 Aug 2009 15:57:39 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 10D7D3EE8B6 for ; Sat, 22 Aug 2009 13:58:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [18.85.46.34]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id 6DivUXDzzLgRbiI5 for ; Sat, 22 Aug 2009 13:58:14 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 16:55:02 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: Kernel 2.6.30.4 XFS(..?) regression (& with/2.6.31-rc6) Message-ID: <20090822205502.GA18904@infradead.org> References: <00980BBF-1206-4BEF-A8AE-B4A8DAE7EC27@sgi.com> <20090816022331.GA2309@infradead.org> <20090822142550.GA10003@infradead.org> <20090822201558.GA17955@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Justin Piszcz Cc: Christoph Hellwig , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 04:46:52PM -0400, Justin Piszcz wrote: >> Well, that would be a good way to find it. But I'm personally not >> interested in spending much time on debugging a problem if it only >> happens with fishy out of tree modules. >> > > .. No out of tree modules are used .. Your previous mail said it only happened using loop-aes. Is that the case or not? _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs