From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n7SMupJd182141 for ; Fri, 28 Aug 2009 17:57:06 -0500 Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 18:57:45 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfsprogs: update CHANGES Message-ID: <20090828225745.GA24127@infradead.org> References: <20090828221304.GA17666@infradead.org> <6854DCEB-F9C8-4969-8012-65B0CD671E38@sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6854DCEB-F9C8-4969-8012-65B0CD671E38@sgi.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Felix Blyakher Cc: Christoph Hellwig , xfs@oss.sgi.com On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 05:49:22PM -0500, Felix Blyakher wrote: > > On Aug 28, 2009, at 5:13 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > >> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig > > Reviewed-by: Felix Blyakher Thanks, I've pushed it out to kernel.org including the missing update to VERSION to bump it to 3.0.3. > I'll generate the 3.0.3 package later tonight. Thanks. release.sh works fine to me so everything should be good. > Are we planning on update of other xfs userland pieces at this > time as well? The only change since the last release in xfsdump and dmapi is adding the executable flag to include/install-sh which doesn't really warrant doing a new release in my opinion. If you want to do one anyway I won't complain either. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs