From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n7U8d4vp014144 for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2009 03:39:14 -0500 Received: from mailsrv5.zmi.at (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id C926E40DCAB for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2009 01:39:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailsrv5.zmi.at (mailsrv5.zmi.at [212.69.164.54]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id uylPiguyhYZo50Ra for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2009 01:39:29 -0700 (PDT) From: Michael Monnerie Subject: Re: zero size file after power failure with kernel 2.6.30.5 Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 10:39:04 +0200 References: <200908292102.21710@zmi.at> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200908301039.05303@zmi.at> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Justin Piszcz , xfs@oss.sgi.com On Samstag 29 August 2009 Justin Piszcz wrote: > I was curious if you could show your smartctl -a output? > > smartctl -a /dev/sda Here the important parts of it: Device Model: WDC WD1500HLFS-01G6U0 Firmware Version: 04.04V01 ID# ATTRIBUTE_NAME FLAG VALUE WORST THRESH TYPE UPDATED WHEN_FAILED RAW_VALUE 1 Raw_Read_Error_Rate 0x000f 200 200 051 Pre-fail Always - 0 3 Spin_Up_Time 0x0003 190 185 021 Pre-fail Always - 1466 4 Start_Stop_Count 0x0032 100 100 000 Old_age Always - 48 5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct 0x0033 200 200 140 Pre-fail Always - 0 7 Seek_Error_Rate 0x000e 200 200 000 Old_age Always - 0 9 Power_On_Hours 0x0032 092 092 000 Old_age Always - 6282 10 Spin_Retry_Count 0x0012 100 253 000 Old_age Always - 0 11 Calibration_Retry_Count 0x0012 100 253 000 Old_age Always - 0 12 Power_Cycle_Count 0x0032 100 100 000 Old_age Always - 48 192 Power-Off_Retract_Count 0x0032 200 200 000 Old_age Always - 13 193 Load_Cycle_Count 0x0032 200 200 000 Old_age Always - 48 194 Temperature_Celsius 0x0022 112 102 000 Old_age Always - 31 196 Reallocated_Event_Count 0x0032 200 200 000 Old_age Always - 0 197 Current_Pending_Sector 0x0012 200 200 000 Old_age Always - 0 198 Offline_Uncorrectable 0x0010 200 200 000 Old_age Offline - 0 199 UDMA_CRC_Error_Count 0x003e 200 200 000 Old_age Always - 0 200 Multi_Zone_Error_Rate 0x0008 200 200 000 Old_age Offline - 0 PNum Test_Description Status Remaining LifeTime(hours) LBA_of_first_error # 1 Short offline Completed without error 00% 6274 - # 2 Extended offline Completed without error 00% 6251 - # 3 Short offline Completed without error 00% 6250 - # 4 Short offline Completed without error 00% 6226 - # 5 Short offline Completed without error 00% 6202 - # 6 Short offline Completed without error 00% 6187 - # 7 Extended offline Completed without error 00% 6167 - # 8 Short offline Completed without error 00% 6145 - # 9 Short offline Completed without error 00% 6121 - #10 Short offline Completed without error 00% 6097 - #11 Extended offline Completed without error 00% 6090 - #12 Extended offline Completed without error 00% 6024 - #13 Short offline Completed without error 00% 3613 - #14 Short offline Completed without error 00% 3589 - #15 Extended offline Completed without error 00% 3567 - #16 Short offline Completed without error 00% 3565 - #17 Short offline Completed without error 00% 3541 - #18 Short offline Completed without error 00% 3517 - #19 Short offline Completed without error 00% 3493 - #20 Short offline Completed without error 00% 3469 - #21 Short offline Completed without error 00% 3445 - > The SU issue most likely resulted in the xfs file going to 0 issue > (i see the same thing on occasion during a PSU issue or crash/reboot) Yes, and that's annoying. I've never had that for reiserfs, so I guess it's really XFS to blame here. I like that filesystem, but such things really shouldn't happen. > however I am curious to see if you see any of the issues here: > http://forums.storagereview.net/index.php?showtopic=27303&hl=velociraptor > > Since you only use one drive and not a raid of the WD Velociraptors, > you may not be affected, but I was curious, thanks. In fact I use 3 VelociRaptor 150GB and 6 Raptors. 8 are in a single RAID-6 in a server running since about 3 years, and during this time 2 Raptors died and were replaced by VelociRaptors. The one I use in my desktop is a spare spart to use in case the server needs one. I just use it because the speed is nice, and I see if it has failures. Smartctl is running as a daemon here, so you can see the SMART self tests. It's almost definitely not the drive. mfg zmi -- // Michael Monnerie, Ing.BSc ----- http://it-management.at // Tel: 0660 / 415 65 31 .network.your.ideas. // PGP Key: "curl -s http://zmi.at/zmi.asc | gpg --import" // Fingerprint: AC19 F9D5 36ED CD8A EF38 500E CE14 91F7 1C12 09B4 // Keyserver: wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net Key-ID: 1C1209B4 _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs