From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n7VCWmnu097210 for ; Mon, 31 Aug 2009 07:33:04 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id E4AE0410516 for ; Mon, 31 Aug 2009 05:33:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [18.85.46.34]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id aqPNTWsVDHCStduB for ; Mon, 31 Aug 2009 05:33:23 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 08:30:10 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: xfs compat_ioctl? Message-ID: <20090831123010.GA2368@infradead.org> References: <4A9B759B.7020401@msgid.tls.msk.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4A9B759B.7020401@msgid.tls.msk.ru> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Michael Tokarev Cc: linux-fsdevel , Linux-kernel , xfs@oss.sgi.com On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 11:02:51AM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote: > Hello! > > I tried to resize an xfs filesystem on 64bit 2.6.30 kernel > using 32bit userland, and that does not work, in dmesg I see: > > ioctl32(xfs_growfs:24426): Unknown cmd fd(3) cmd(400c586e){t:'X';sz:12} arg(ffa56df4) on /mnt > ioctl32(xfs_growfs:24427): Unknown cmd fd(3) cmd(400c586e){t:'X';sz:12} arg(ff991254) on /mnt > > so apparently there's no compat_ioctl layer for these ioctls. > > Are there any plans to add these? :) Are you sure you're testing 2.6.30? The copat ioctls were added in 2.6.28. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs