From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n88FYr1H078410 for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2009 10:35:04 -0500 Received: from lvps87-230-0-242.dedicated.hosteurope.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id C940243426A for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2009 08:35:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lvps87-230-0-242.dedicated.hosteurope.de (lvps87-230-0-242.dedicated.hosteurope.de [87.230.0.242]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id EeAThF9kWEEzQj1X for ; Tue, 08 Sep 2009 08:35:31 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 17:34:46 +0200 From: Michael Guntsche Subject: xfs_repair speedups Message-ID: <20090908153446.GA517@trillian.comsick.at> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: xfs@oss.sgi.com Hi list, I just tested the repair speedups on my setup here and could see a big speed improvement. The setup is an old Pentium IV 1.7GHz with 512MB RAM and a 1.2 TB XFS on lvm2 on RAID-5. time xfs_repair -n Version 3.0.2 real 0m27.983s user 0m20.641s sys 0m4.436s time xfs_repair -n Version 3.0.3-repair-speedups real 0m8.599s user 0m2.444s sys 0m0.228s Especially Phase 4 is a lot faster on my setup here. Kind regards, Michael _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs