From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n8FCltdG162242 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 07:48:01 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 53DB51658D2A for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 05:49:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [18.85.46.34]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id EISk4anjjdC0ZoiH for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 05:49:09 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 08:49:08 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [xfstests]: add-reiserfs-specific-_check_reiserfs_filesystem patch Message-ID: <20090915124908.GA4070@infradead.org> References: <200909140846.52217.jbarton@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200909140846.52217.jbarton@redhat.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Jaroslav Barton Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 08:46:52AM +0200, Jaroslav Barton wrote: > Hi, > > I was on vacation last week. > > I am using xfstests in my project and testing reiserfs filesystem. Reiserfsck > waits for confirmation before fsck is runned. This patch runs reiserfsck with > --yes parameter and confirmation is not needed. I'd be much more happy if you would add a way to pass options to _check_generic_filesystem, e.g. by introducing a _fsck_opts machinery mirroring _mkfs_opts and _mount_opts. That would also clean up what Ted did in 8b61ae6352b1f92cc004a7349b90f39609c77a8f. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs