From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Tommy van Leeuwen <tommy@news-service.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: 2.6.31 xfs_fs_destroy_inode: cannot reclaim
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 14:59:53 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090917185953.GA24590@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <89c4f90c0909160327l1a1fdaa2g131cd7fa249ad529@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 12:27:21PM +0200, Tommy van Leeuwen wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> We had this error reported on the list about 1 or 2 months ago. During
> that time a lot of fixes were applied. However, we still experience
> this problem with the recent 2.6.31 tree. We've also applied an extra
> log entry to aid in debugging.
>
> printk("XFS: inode_init_always failed to re-initialize inode\n");
>
> However, we didn't see this logging!
Can you try the patch below, its does two things
- remove all that reclaimable flagging if we reclaim the inode
directly. This removes any possibility of racing with the reclaiming
thread.
- adds asserts if one of the reclaim-related flags is already set.
Index: xfs/fs/xfs/xfs_vnodeops.c
===================================================================
--- xfs.orig/fs/xfs/xfs_vnodeops.c 2009-09-17 14:39:37.799003843 -0300
+++ xfs/fs/xfs/xfs_vnodeops.c 2009-09-17 14:50:14.987005862 -0300
@@ -2460,39 +2460,35 @@ int
xfs_reclaim(
xfs_inode_t *ip)
{
-
xfs_itrace_entry(ip);
ASSERT(!VN_MAPPED(VFS_I(ip)));
/* bad inode, get out here ASAP */
- if (is_bad_inode(VFS_I(ip))) {
- xfs_ireclaim(ip);
- return 0;
- }
+ if (is_bad_inode(VFS_I(ip)))
+ goto out_reclaim;
xfs_ioend_wait(ip);
ASSERT(XFS_FORCED_SHUTDOWN(ip->i_mount) || ip->i_delayed_blks == 0);
/*
+ * We should never get here with one of the reclaim flags already set.
+ */
+ BUG_ON(xfs_iflags_test(ip, XFS_IRECLAIMABLE));
+ BUG_ON(xfs_iflags_test(ip, XFS_IRECLAIM));
+
+ /*
* If we have nothing to flush with this inode then complete the
- * teardown now, otherwise break the link between the xfs inode and the
- * linux inode and clean up the xfs inode later. This avoids flushing
- * the inode to disk during the delete operation itself.
- *
- * When breaking the link, we need to set the XFS_IRECLAIMABLE flag
- * first to ensure that xfs_iunpin() will never see an xfs inode
- * that has a linux inode being reclaimed. Synchronisation is provided
- * by the i_flags_lock.
+ * teardown now, otherwise delay the flush operation.
*/
- if (!ip->i_update_core && (ip->i_itemp == NULL)) {
- xfs_ilock(ip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL);
- xfs_iflock(ip);
- xfs_iflags_set(ip, XFS_IRECLAIMABLE);
- return xfs_reclaim_inode(ip, 1, XFS_IFLUSH_DELWRI_ELSE_SYNC);
+ if (ip->i_update_core || ip->i_itemp) {
+ xfs_inode_set_reclaim_tag(ip);
+ return 0;
}
- xfs_inode_set_reclaim_tag(ip);
+
+out_reclaim:
+ xfs_ireclaim(ip);
return 0;
}
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-17 18:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-16 10:27 2.6.31 xfs_fs_destroy_inode: cannot reclaim Tommy van Leeuwen
2009-09-17 18:59 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2009-09-29 10:15 ` Patrick Schreurs
2009-09-29 12:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-09-30 10:48 ` Patrick Schreurs
2009-09-30 12:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-10-02 14:24 ` Bas Couwenberg
2009-10-05 21:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-10-06 9:04 ` Patrick Schreurs
2009-10-07 1:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-10-08 8:45 ` Patrick Schreurs
2009-10-11 7:43 ` Patrick Schreurs
2009-10-11 12:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-10-12 23:38 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-10-15 15:06 ` Tommy van Leeuwen
2009-10-18 23:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-10-19 1:17 ` Dave Chinner
2009-10-19 3:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-10-19 1:16 ` Dave Chinner
2009-10-19 3:54 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-10-20 3:40 ` Dave Chinner
2009-10-21 9:45 ` Tommy van Leeuwen
2009-10-22 8:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-10-27 10:41 ` Tommy van Leeuwen
[not found] ` <89c4f90c0910280519k759230c1r7b1586932ac792f7@mail.gmail.com>
2009-10-30 10:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-11-03 14:46 ` Patrick Schreurs
2009-11-14 16:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
[not found] ` <4B0A8075.8080008@news-service.com>
[not found] ` <20091211115932.GA20632@infradead.org>
[not found] ` <4B3F9F88.9030307@news-service.com>
[not found] ` <20100107110446.GA13802@discord.disaster>
[not found] ` <4B45CFAC.4000607@news-service.com>
2010-01-08 11:31 ` [PATCH] Inode reclaim fixes (was Re: 2.6.31 xfs_fs_destroy_inode: cannot reclaim) Dave Chinner
2010-01-11 20:22 ` Patrick Schreurs
2010-01-15 11:01 ` Patrick Schreurs
2010-02-01 16:52 ` Patrick Schreurs
2010-02-08 10:16 ` Patrick Schreurs
2010-02-08 19:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-02-09 8:48 ` Patrick Schreurs
2010-02-09 10:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-02-10 12:42 ` Patrick Schreurs
2010-02-10 14:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-02-10 15:42 ` Patrick Schreurs
2010-02-10 15:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2010-02-24 18:30 ` Patrick Schreurs
2010-02-25 23:45 ` Dave Chinner
2010-03-01 9:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090917185953.GA24590@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=tommy@news-service.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox