From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n8QD9aAh238827 for ; Sat, 26 Sep 2009 08:09:38 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 7FAF9B81CCA for ; Sat, 26 Sep 2009 06:10:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [18.85.46.34]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id 6JFcsrOItn3ZWiq7 for ; Sat, 26 Sep 2009 06:10:55 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 09:10:43 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: mmap vs mtime in 2.6.26 and up Message-ID: <20090926131043.GA25204@infradead.org> References: <20090518114305.GA6303@infradead.org> <87vdj742dt.fsf@tac.ki.iif.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87vdj742dt.fsf@tac.ki.iif.hu> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Ferenc Wagner Cc: Peter Staubach , Miklos Szeredi , Ray Lee , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com, Christoph Hellwig , Andrew Morton On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 02:47:42PM +0200, Ferenc Wagner wrote: > I added some fresh test results to > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2645. In short, under > 2.6.30-rc8 the test program reports full failure on XFS and RAMFS, > full success on EXT3, VFAT and ReiserFS, and mixed results on TMPFS: There's a patch queued up for inclusion in 2.6.32 to work around this issue in XFS. The lack of a proper callout from the VFS still makes this a much less than ideal solution. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs