From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n96D8t6e062822 for ; Tue, 6 Oct 2009 08:08:57 -0500 Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 09:10:20 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: Inconsistent {RECLAIM_FS-ON-R} -> {IN-RECLAIM_FS-W} usage in XFS Message-ID: <20091006131020.GA12343@infradead.org> References: <4ACB3AC5.4010603@vlnb.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4ACB3AC5.4010603@vlnb.net> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Vladislav Bolkhovitin Cc: xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com, xfs@oss.sgi.com On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 04:40:37PM +0400, Vladislav Bolkhovitin wrote: > Hello, > > After upgrading to 2.6.31 with SCST testings I started seeing the > following lockdep messages. I have not seen them in 2.6.29. Looks like > it's something recently introduced. The lockdep code to track this has been recently introduced. I've sent some patches to fix it ages ago, but so far no one has bothered to review them. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs