* moving libhandle to /usr
@ 2009-10-06 15:42 Christoph Hellwig
2009-10-06 15:47 ` Eric Sandeen
2009-10-06 19:33 ` Mike Frysinger
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2009-10-06 15:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: vapier, nathans, sandeen, xfs
Currently we install the versioned libhandle into /lib by default,
and all other libraries into /usr. Given that no program in / actually
uses libhandle this seems rather awkward to me. From Mike's comments
in the past I think Gentoo already installs it into /usr anyway.
Is there anything speaking against moving all libraries to /usr and
switching Debian/Fedora to that aswell?
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: moving libhandle to /usr
2009-10-06 15:42 moving libhandle to /usr Christoph Hellwig
@ 2009-10-06 15:47 ` Eric Sandeen
2009-10-06 18:45 ` Nathan Scott
2009-10-06 19:33 ` Mike Frysinger
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Eric Sandeen @ 2009-10-06 15:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christoph Hellwig; +Cc: nathans, vapier, xfs
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Currently we install the versioned libhandle into /lib by default,
> and all other libraries into /usr. Given that no program in / actually
> uses libhandle this seems rather awkward to me. From Mike's comments
> in the past I think Gentoo already installs it into /usr anyway.
>
> Is there anything speaking against moving all libraries to /usr and
> switching Debian/Fedora to that aswell?
>
Seems fine to me;
/sbin/fsck.xfs:
not a dynamic executable
/sbin/mkfs.xfs:
libuuid.so.1 => /lib64/libuuid.so.1 (0x0000003327e00000)
librt.so.1 => /lib64/librt.so.1 (0x0000003df3e00000)
libpthread.so.0 => /lib64/libpthread.so.0 (0x0000003df2e00000)
libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x0000003df2200000)
/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x0000003df1e00000)
/sbin/xfs_repair:
libuuid.so.1 => /lib64/libuuid.so.1 (0x0000003327e00000)
librt.so.1 => /lib64/librt.so.1 (0x0000003df3e00000)
libpthread.so.0 => /lib64/libpthread.so.0 (0x0000003df2e00000)
libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x0000003df2200000)
/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x0000003df1e00000)
As you say, nothing in /sbin needs it AFAICT.
-Eric
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: moving libhandle to /usr
2009-10-06 15:47 ` Eric Sandeen
@ 2009-10-06 18:45 ` Nathan Scott
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Nathan Scott @ 2009-10-06 18:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric Sandeen; +Cc: Christoph Hellwig, vapier, xfs
----- "Eric Sandeen" <sandeen@sandeen.net> wrote:
> Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Currently we install the versioned libhandle into /lib by default,
> > and all other libraries into /usr. Given that no program in /
> actually
> > uses libhandle this seems rather awkward to me. From Mike's
> comments
> > in the past I think Gentoo already installs it into /usr anyway.
> >
> > Is there anything speaking against moving all libraries to /usr and
> > switching Debian/Fedora to that aswell?
> >
>
> Seems fine to me;
*nod* - looks ok to me too.
--
Nathan
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: moving libhandle to /usr
2009-10-06 15:42 moving libhandle to /usr Christoph Hellwig
2009-10-06 15:47 ` Eric Sandeen
@ 2009-10-06 19:33 ` Mike Frysinger
2009-10-06 23:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Mike Frysinger @ 2009-10-06 19:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christoph Hellwig; +Cc: nathans, sandeen, xfs
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 611 bytes --]
On Tuesday 06 October 2009 11:42:49 Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Currently we install the versioned libhandle into /lib by default,
> and all other libraries into /usr. Given that no program in / actually
> uses libhandle this seems rather awkward to me. From Mike's comments
> in the past I think Gentoo already installs it into /usr anyway.
>
> Is there anything speaking against moving all libraries to /usr and
> switching Debian/Fedora to that aswell?
xfsdump uses it and xfsdump is installed into / by default right ? so
libhandle needs to be in /lib so long as xfsdump is in /sbin.
-mike
[-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 121 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: moving libhandle to /usr
2009-10-06 19:33 ` Mike Frysinger
@ 2009-10-06 23:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-10-07 0:53 ` Eric Sandeen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2009-10-06 23:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mike Frysinger; +Cc: Christoph Hellwig, nathans, sandeen, xfs
On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 03:33:46PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Tuesday 06 October 2009 11:42:49 Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Currently we install the versioned libhandle into /lib by default,
> > and all other libraries into /usr. Given that no program in / actually
> > uses libhandle this seems rather awkward to me. From Mike's comments
> > in the past I think Gentoo already installs it into /usr anyway.
> >
> > Is there anything speaking against moving all libraries to /usr and
> > switching Debian/Fedora to that aswell?
>
> xfsdump uses it and xfsdump is installed into / by default right ? so
> libhandle needs to be in /lib so long as xfsdump is in /sbin.
Indeed, the makefile configuration currently builds it into /, while
the configure default uses /usr. Yikes..
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: moving libhandle to /usr
2009-10-06 23:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
@ 2009-10-07 0:53 ` Eric Sandeen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Eric Sandeen @ 2009-10-07 0:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christoph Hellwig; +Cc: nathans, Mike Frysinger, xfs
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 03:33:46PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> On Tuesday 06 October 2009 11:42:49 Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>> Currently we install the versioned libhandle into /lib by default,
>>> and all other libraries into /usr. Given that no program in / actually
>>> uses libhandle this seems rather awkward to me. From Mike's comments
>>> in the past I think Gentoo already installs it into /usr anyway.
>>>
>>> Is there anything speaking against moving all libraries to /usr and
>>> switching Debian/Fedora to that aswell?
>> xfsdump uses it and xfsdump is installed into / by default right ? so
>> libhandle needs to be in /lib so long as xfsdump is in /sbin.
>
> Indeed, the makefile configuration currently builds it into /, while
> the configure default uses /usr. Yikes..
argh I did rpm -ql xfsprogs xfsdump | grep bin ... on a box that didn't
have xfsdump installed. Argh.
Thanks for the catch Mike ;)
-Eric
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-10-07 0:51 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-10-06 15:42 moving libhandle to /usr Christoph Hellwig
2009-10-06 15:47 ` Eric Sandeen
2009-10-06 18:45 ` Nathan Scott
2009-10-06 19:33 ` Mike Frysinger
2009-10-06 23:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2009-10-07 0:53 ` Eric Sandeen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox