From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com>
Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15])
	by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id
	n9AGN9Tp155258 for <xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Sat, 10 Oct 2009 11:23:16 -0500
Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 889C61D7A24D
	for <xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Sat, 10 Oct 2009 09:24:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [18.85.46.34])
	by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id 3yc2iHb6IZ2j9xMk for
	<xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Sat, 10 Oct 2009 09:24:37 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2009 12:24:28 -0400
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mkfs: add discard support
Message-ID: <20091010162428.GA22720@infradead.org>
References: <20091006184758.GA4780@infradead.org>
	<20091007044215.GK9464@discord.disaster>
	<87iqerymu0.fsf@basil.nowhere.org>
	<20091009023022.GL9464@discord.disaster>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20091009023022.GL9464@discord.disaster>
List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI <xfs.oss.sgi.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/options/xfs>,
	<mailto:xfs-request@oss.sgi.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://oss.sgi.com/pipermail/xfs>
List-Post: <mailto:xfs@oss.sgi.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xfs-request@oss.sgi.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs>,
	<mailto:xfs-request@oss.sgi.com?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com
Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>, xfs@oss.sgi.com

So does any of these means a positive review for the full patch, or just
philosophical discussions?

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs