From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n9C1VemK009572 for ; Sun, 11 Oct 2009 20:31:42 -0500 Received: from one.firstfloor.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 8511DD6B8AC for ; Sun, 11 Oct 2009 18:33:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from one.firstfloor.org (one.firstfloor.org [213.235.205.2]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id DnelBlpBxHHKv4Qc for ; Sun, 11 Oct 2009 18:33:08 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 03:33:06 +0200 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [PATCH] mkfs: add discard support Message-ID: <20091012013306.GH1656@one.firstfloor.org> References: <20091006184758.GA4780@infradead.org> <20091007044215.GK9464@discord.disaster> <87iqerymu0.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> <20091009023022.GL9464@discord.disaster> <20091010162428.GA22720@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091010162428.GA22720@infradead.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Andi Kleen , xfs@oss.sgi.com On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 12:24:28PM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > So does any of these means a positive review for the full patch, or just > philosophical discussions? It was in principle positive, except for the request to add a option to turn it off to handle Dave's prefill use case. -Andi -- ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs