From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com>
Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25])
	by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id
	n9DMMKEd157026 for <xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Tue, 13 Oct 2009 17:22:21 -0500
Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 398E01C31
	for <xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Tue, 13 Oct 2009 15:23:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [18.85.46.34])
	by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id MgQEIZ18iAtyNngE for
	<xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Tue, 13 Oct 2009 15:23:51 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 18:23:50 -0400
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/14] repair: split up scanfunc_ino
Message-ID: <20091013222350.GA8902@infradead.org>
References: <20090902175531.469184575@bombadil.infradead.org>
	<20090902175840.403232401@bombadil.infradead.org>
	<4AD38C50.2060403@sandeen.net>
	<20091013221946.GB31385@infradead.org>
	<4AD4FDA8.6060705@sandeen.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4AD4FDA8.6060705@sandeen.net>
List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI <xfs.oss.sgi.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/options/xfs>,
	<mailto:xfs-request@oss.sgi.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://oss.sgi.com/pipermail/xfs>
List-Post: <mailto:xfs@oss.sgi.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xfs-request@oss.sgi.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs>,
	<mailto:xfs-request@oss.sgi.com?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com
Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, xfs@oss.sgi.com

On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 05:22:32PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 03:06:40PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> >>> +					agno, agbno,
> >>> +				mp->m_sb.sb_inopblock);
> >> pretty weird indentation here can't you just merge w/ previous line?
> 
> I get that...
> 
> 
> +_("inode chunk claims used block, inobt block - agno %d, bno %d, inopb
> %d\n"),
> +					agno, agbno,
> +				mp->m_sb.sb_inopblock);

Yeah, you're right.   I'll fix it up before commiting.

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs