From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n9M8SxF2073634 for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2009 03:29:00 -0500 Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 10:30:22 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [xfs-masters] Inconsistent {RECLAIM_FS-ON-R} -> {IN-RECLAIM_FS-W} usage in XFS Message-ID: <20091022083022.GB27577@lst.de> References: <4ACB3AC5.4010603@vlnb.net> <20091006131020.GA12343@infradead.org> <4ADF36E3.8080801@sandeen.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4ADF36E3.8080801@sandeen.net> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Eric Sandeen Cc: Christoph Hellwig , xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com, Vladislav Bolkhovitin , xfs@oss.sgi.com On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 11:29:23AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > > The lockdep code to track this has been recently introduced. > > > > I've sent some patches to fix it ages ago, but so far no one has > > bothered to review them. > > Christoph, remind me again which patch and I'll try to find time now > that I'm getting Fedora bug reports. :) I've recentlhy sent out some even simpler patches to sort this out, see here: http://oss.sgi.com/pipermail/xfs/2009-October/042857.html http://oss.sgi.com/pipermail/xfs/2009-October/042858.html _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs