From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n9P2onwK075277 for ; Sat, 24 Oct 2009 21:50:51 -0500 Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2009 22:52:23 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] add lpath_to_handle to libhandle Message-ID: <20091025025223.GA20709@infradead.org> References: <4AE08DC7.7000200@sgi.com> <1AB9A794DBDDF54A8A81BE2296F7BDFE83AE08@cf--amer001e--3.americas.sgi.com> <20091024133729.GA23125@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091024133729.GA23125@infradead.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Alex Elder Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 09:37:29AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 01:08:37PM -0500, Alex Elder wrote: > > Looks good. I will up the version number after get this pulled in. > > I will publish this and get the version number/dependency stuff > > straightened out before I take the change for xfsrestore. > > Please hold back for a while with making a release. So you made a relase without any communication to the developers and no time to respon. If this is the way SGI thinks they should work I think it's time to make the kernel.org trees an official new xfsprogs-ng tree and just ignore SGI. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs