From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n9P71uqX091438 for ; Sun, 25 Oct 2009 02:01:58 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 1401BC4FEA9 for ; Sun, 25 Oct 2009 00:03:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [18.85.46.34]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id jko48gXiLzTrGBQm for ; Sun, 25 Oct 2009 00:03:32 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2009 03:03:31 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: xfsprogs 3.0.5 "release" Message-ID: <20091025070331.GA21120@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: xfs@oss.sgi.com, nathans@debian.org, vapier@gentoo.org, sandeen@sandeen.net It looks like SGI rushed out a 3.0.5 xfsprogs release which contains various half-cooked changes including additions to shared libraries without bumping the minor version and wrong patch attributions. I can only recommend to not pick it up for distributions and wait for a proper release from the kernel.org trees after the full release engineering process has finished. The current plan is to have a release end of Novemeber, we'll have to figure out the naming / numbering to not clash with the SGI versions. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs