From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id nAG3Kf0B075248 for ; Sun, 15 Nov 2009 21:20:41 -0600 Received: from mail.internode.on.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 94E5C1881058 for ; Sun, 15 Nov 2009 19:21:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.internode.on.net (bld-mail19.adl2.internode.on.net [150.101.137.104]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id JEdCJpGmcevxij3F for ; Sun, 15 Nov 2009 19:21:01 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 14:20:57 +1100 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] xfs: kill the STATIC_INLINE macro Message-ID: <20091116032057.GF9467@discord.disaster> References: <20091114161717.233372584@bombadil.infradead.org> <20091114161801.978180093@bombadil.infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091114161801.978180093@bombadil.infradead.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 11:17:22AM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Remove our own STATIC_INLINE macro. For small function inside implementation > files just use STATIC and let gcc inline it, and for those in headers do the > normal static inline - they are all small enough to be inlined for debug > builds, too. > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig Looks good. Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs