public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	xfs@oss.sgi.com, Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] xfs: Don't use PF_MEMALLOC
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 09:11:08 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091117221108.GK9467@discord.disaster> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091117162235.3DEB.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>

On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 04:23:43PM +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> 
> Non MM subsystem must not use PF_MEMALLOC. Memory reclaim need few
> memory, anyone must not prevent it. Otherwise the system cause
> mysterious hang-up and/or OOM Killer invokation.

The xfsbufd is a woken run by a registered memory shaker. i.e. it
runs when the system needs to reclaim memory. It forceѕ the
delayed write metadata buffers (of which there can be a lot) to disk
so that they can be reclaimed on IO completion. This IO submission
may require ѕome memory to be allocated to be able to free that
memory.

Hence, AFAICT the use of PF_MEMALLOC is valid here.

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  reply	other threads:[~2009-11-17 22:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20091117161551.3DD4.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>
2009-11-17  7:23 ` [PATCH 7/7] xfs: Don't use PF_MEMALLOC KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-11-17 22:11   ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2009-11-18  8:56     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-11-18 22:16       ` Dave Chinner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20091117221108.GK9467@discord.disaster \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox