From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id nASIgYuq260577 for ; Sat, 28 Nov 2009 12:42:35 -0600 Received: from enyo.dsw2k3.info (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id A1C3ED94666 for ; Sat, 28 Nov 2009 10:43:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from enyo.dsw2k3.info (enyo.dsw2k3.info [195.71.86.239]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id cAxzppyUr5lXylgQ for ; Sat, 28 Nov 2009 10:43:03 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 19:42:50 +0100 From: Matthias Schniedermeyer Subject: Re: please help me! thanks Message-ID: <20091128184250.GA30986@citd.de> References: <20091128033325.5032D5C121@mail3-144.sinamail.sina.com.cn> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091128033325.5032D5C121@mail3-144.sinamail.sina.com.cn> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: givemefile@sina.com Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On 28.11.2009 11:33, givemefile@sina.com wrote: >  my OS: > [root@DDD-1 ~]# uname -a > Linux DDD-1 2.6.18-128.el5 #1 SMP Wed Dec 17 11:42:39 EST 2008 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux .el5 smells like Red Hat, Red Hat doesn't do XFS. At least in nothing that is currently released AFAIR. Bis denn -- Real Programmers consider "what you see is what you get" to be just as bad a concept in Text Editors as it is in women. No, the Real Programmer wants a "you asked for it, you got it" text editor -- complicated, cryptic, powerful, unforgiving, dangerous. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs