please help me! thanks

please help me! thanks

[givemefile]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1076 bytes --]

 my OS: 
[root@DDD-1 ~]# uname -a
Linux DDD-1 2.6.18-128.el5 #1 SMP Wed Dec 17 11:42:39 EST 2008 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
[root@DDD-1 ~]# 
 
[root@DDD-1 ~]# cat /proc/filesystems 
nodev   sysfs
nodev   rootfs
nodev   bdev
nodev   proc
nodev   cpuset
nodev   binfmt_misc
nodev   debugfs
nodev   securityfs
nodev   sockfs
nodev   usbfs
nodev   pipefs
nodev   anon_inodefs
nodev   futexfs
nodev   tmpfs
nodev   inotifyfs
nodev   eventpollfs
nodev   devpts
        ext2
nodev   ramfs
nodev   hugetlbfs
        iso9660
nodev   mqueue
        ext3
nodev   vmhgfs
nodev   vmblock
nodev   rpc_pipefs
nodev   autofs
[root@DDD-1 ~]# 
 
 
this OS don't xfs filesystem..
Please tell me How to do it ?
thanks
 

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1236 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 121 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

Re: please help me! thanks

[Eric Sandeen]

You need to talk to your Linux distributor....

-Eric

On Nov 27, 2009, at 9:33 PM, givemefile@sina.com wrote:

>  my OS:
>
> [root@DDD-1 ~]# uname -a
> Linux DDD-1 2.6.18-128.el5 #1 SMP Wed Dec 17 11:42:39 EST 2008 i686  
> i686 i386 GNU/Linux
> [root@DDD-1 ~]#
>
>
>
> [root@DDD-1 ~]# cat /proc/filesystems
> nodev   sysfs
> nodev   rootfs
> nodev   bdev
> nodev   proc
> nodev   cpuset
> nodev   binfmt_misc
> nodev   debugfs
> nodev   securityfs
> nodev   sockfs
> nodev   usbfs
> nodev   pipefs
> nodev   anon_inodefs
> nodev   futexfs
> nodev   tmpfs
> nodev   inotifyfs
> nodev   eventpollfs
> nodev   devpts
>         ext2
> nodev   ramfs
> nodev   hugetlbfs
>         iso9660
> nodev   mqueue
>         ext3
> nodev   vmhgfs
> nodev   vmblock
> nodev   rpc_pipefs
> nodev   autofs
> [root@DDD-1 ~]#
>
>
>
>
>
> this OS don't xfs filesystem..
>
> Please tell me How to do it ?
>
> thanks
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@oss.sgi.com
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

Re: please help me! thanks

[Matthias Schniedermeyer]

On 28.11.2009 11:33, givemefile@sina.com wrote:
>  my OS: 
> [root@DDD-1 ~]# uname -a
> Linux DDD-1 2.6.18-128.el5 #1 SMP Wed Dec 17 11:42:39 EST 2008 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux

.el5 smells like Red Hat, Red Hat doesn't do XFS.
At least in nothing that is currently released AFAIR.





Bis denn

-- 
Real Programmers consider "what you see is what you get" to be just as 
bad a concept in Text Editors as it is in women. No, the Real Programmer
wants a "you asked for it, you got it" text editor -- complicated, 
cryptic, powerful, unforgiving, dangerous.

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

Re: please help me! thanks

[Matthias Schniedermeyer]

On 28.11.2009 18:02, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 07:42:50PM +0100, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote:
> 
> > .el5 smells like Red Hat, Red Hat doesn't do XFS.
> > At least in nothing that is currently released AFAIR.
> 
> 5.4 has XFS

I googled 5.4 and found a CERT that mentions 2.6.18-164.
So i guess minimum kernel for 5.4 is way more recent than -128.

So OP appears that have a pre 5.4 release running.





Bis denn

-- 
Real Programmers consider "what you see is what you get" to be just as 
bad a concept in Text Editors as it is in women. No, the Real Programmer
wants a "you asked for it, you got it" text editor -- complicated, 
cryptic, powerful, unforgiving, dangerous.

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

Re: please help me! thanks

[Peter Grandi]

[ ... ]

>>> .el5 smells like Red Hat, Red Hat doesn't do XFS. At least in
>>> nothing that is currently released AFAIR.

>> 5.4 has XFS

> I googled 5.4 and found a CERT that mentions 2.6.18-164. So i
> guess minimum kernel for 5.4 is way more recent than -128.

I think that while the 'xfs.ko' module is part of the base kernels
available standard with EL 5.4, there is an XFS (including 'xfsprogs'
and support) "layered product" from RedHat (that is an optional
extra license) which has become available starting from EL 5.4.

Apparently RH have finally realized that many of their enterprise
customers have large XFS based storage systems and these are not
going to be moved to 'ext4' any time soon (also because EL6 is not
going to appear for a while yet).

  That's I think way EricS replied to consult the distribution
  vendor.

Alternatively there are the XFS RPMs from ElRepo or CentOSPlus or
SL5; since EL releases are supposed (mostly indeed in my experience)
to be binary-compatible within major releases, they work well across
all EL5 clones.

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs